Nor should the AT rifle increase the combat effectiveness against infantry as the rate of fire and ammo count and weight of the weapon would hamper its combat effectiveness against infantry. Now for balance sake it should pen the armour in game but should not be as effective if not more effective then a AT gun like the zis. And by the time the panzer IV was made AT rifles could not penetrate the main armour of the tank. I see way to many blobs that destroy early and mid game units in seconds. SUB TOPIC: since I don’t want to start a whole new thread and I have had my faults explained to me here what about the PTRS AT rifle for the soviets. if no one else gets it then the British should not get it. The Bofors gun was developed and made by Sweden and was first adopted by the USA and then followed up by every other country in the war. ☭ Forrest Gump ☭ a écrit :The Bofors AA gun should not be on the British team if it is not in any other country.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |